Guidelines
Instructions for Authors
International Journal of Medical and Health Science welcomes high-quality and original manuscripts that contribute to the advancement of research across diverse areas of medical and health sciences. The journal provides an international platform for scholars, researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals to disseminate innovative theoretical and applied research.
Manuscript Types Accepted
Original Research articles present detailed studies reporting original research findings.
Review Articles provide comprehensive analyses of specific topics.
Case Studies document treatments and outcomes that contribute to knowledge.
Conceptual studies and theoretical papers are also considered for publication.
General Submission Requirements
Manuscripts should be submitted in English. All submissions must be original work, not previously published, and not under consideration elsewhere. Submissions should adhere to the ethical guidelines applicable to research and publication. Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest.
Manuscript Preparation
The title page includes the manuscript title, authors' names and affiliations, and corresponding author details.
An abstract not exceeding 250 words must summarize the key aspects of the study.
A set of 3–5 relevant keywords is required.
The main text follows the structure: Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion.
APA style is required for all references.
Figures and tables remain properly labeled and positioned within the text.
Supplementary materials may be included and are published online only.
Formatting Requirements
Preparation in Microsoft Word format is required using 12-point Times New Roman font. Text must be 1.5 line spaced with margins of at least one inch on all sides.
Reviewer Guidelines
Peer Review Process
A rigorous double-blind peer review system is followed, ensuring that the identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential. Evaluation is based on academic merit, originality, methodological rigour, and relevance to the journal’s scope, maintaining fairness and transparency.
Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
An essential role is played by reviewers in maintaining academic quality and integrity. Objective, constructive, and evidence-based evaluations are expected, focusing on scientific merit and improving clarity and overall quality.
Considerations Before Accepting a Review
Acceptance of a review requires subject expertise relevant to the manuscript.
Availability within the specified timeframe is necessary.
Disclosure of any financial, professional, or personal conflicts of interest is mandatory before proceeding.
Criteria for Manuscript Evaluation
Originality must be demonstrated through new ideas or insights.
A meaningful scholarly contribution to the field is expected.
Alignment with the journal’s scope remains essential.
Clarity in writing and logical structure strengthens the manuscript.
Assessment of Manuscript Sections
Clarity of the title ensures accurate representation of the study focus.
A concise abstract summarizes objectives, methods, results, and conclusions.
The introduction defines the research problem and objectives.
Methodology outlines the research design and analytical approach.
Results present findings in a logical and structured manner.
Discussion and conclusion interpret findings and highlight significance.
Tables and figures support the content with proper labeling.
Language and Clarity
Clear and professional English is required throughout the manuscript. Responsibility for grammatical accuracy and readability lies with the authors.
Reviewer Reports and Recommendations
A concise summary of the manuscript is expected.
Major issues requiring revision must be clearly identified.
Minor comments should provide constructive suggestions.
Evaluation of originality and relevance is necessary.
Critical assessment of methodology and results is required.
Ethical Standards and Conduct
All manuscripts remain confidential documents.
Objectivity must guide every evaluation.
Identification of relevant uncited sources is encouraged.
Use of review information for personal advantage is strictly prohibited.
