DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF FROZEN SECTION COMPARED TO PERMANENT PATHOLOGY IN CAUSTIC INGESTION

Authors

  • Esmaeil Hajinasrollah Professor of General Surgery Shahid Behshti University of Médical Science Loghman Médical Center

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v4i4.53

Keywords:

caustic ingestion, Frozen Section, Permanent Section, Pathology, high degree burns

Abstract

Introduction:-

Endoscopy is mandatory for assessment of severity of esophageal and gastric damage after corrosive burns. There are various mucosal damage classifications, which are unreliable for surgical decision making. Confirmation of endoscopic methods of burn depth estimation with pathologic findings is lacking. Faulty resection of burned esophagus and stomach based on mucosal damage also may be done.  Second look has its own problem, and diagnostic doubt may still remain because intra-operative findings have not enough validity for decision making. New modality for rapid an accurate assessment of injury depth may be frozen section.

Method and materials

This is a blinded prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of frozen section in estimation of burn depth.  Fifty one patients with grade 2 or 3 mucosal burn due to caustic injury underwent surgical exploration and biopsy taking. Samples reported by two pathologists.  Grading of samples either frozen section or permanent compared to each other. Intraoperative judgment of the surgeon compared with pathologic findings. Interrater reliability of examinations compared to each other by the kappa statistic. 

Results

Biopsy samples of fifty one patients with mean age of 33.4 years evaluated and compared to intra-operative findings .Thirty seven patients graded 2 and fourteen were in grade 3 endoscopy. At grade three, only 5 cases had the entire thickness of the stomach burn. Also, from 10 cases of gastrosophagectomy, 5 cases had mucous and under-mucous membranes burn. There were so many variations between pathologic diagnosis of burn depth and judgment of the surgeon (kappa<0.2).

Conclusion:

 Frozen section examination can be an accurate tool for final decision making in corrosive ingestion. Second look surgical exploration can be ignored from the management plan. Intraoperative opinion of a surgeon for estimating necrosis is not accurate. Futile resections are preventable, and Limited resection based on frozen section examination of burn margins will be possible. Limited resection probably made later reconstruction more feasible

References

. 1.Zargar SA, Kochhar R, Meth aS, et al The role of fiberoptic endoscopy in the management of corrosive ingestion and modified endoscopic classification of burns, Gastrointest Endosc 1991 37(2), 165-169.

. 2 .Estrera A, Taylor W, Mills LJ, Platt MR: Corrosive burns of the esophagus and stomach: A recommendation for an aggressive surgical approach. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 41:276-283

. Siew MK, Nzewi Onyekwelu, et al, Corrosive injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract: Still a major surgical dilemma. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 28;12(32):5223-5228

. Kirsh MM, Ritter F: Caustic ingestion and subsequent damage to the oropharyngeal and digestive passages. Ann Thorac Surg 1976; 21:74.

. Holinger PH. Management of esophageal lesions caused by chemical burns. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1968; 77: 819- 829

. Gumaste VV, Dave PB. Ingestion of corrosive substances by adults. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 1-5

. Ferguson MK, et al, Early evaluation and therapy for caustic esophageal injury. Am J surg 157 (1989), no. 1, 116-120

. 8. Penner GE: Acid ingestion: Toxicity and treatment. Ann Emerg Med 1980; 9:374

. 9. M. Pierre Cattan, Nicolas Munoz-Bongrand, MD, et al, Extensive abdominal surgery after caustic ingestion, Ann Surg 231 (2000), no. 4, 519-523.

. 10. N. P. Laucevicius VL, Razukas V, Jurevicius B, Misevicius I, Noreika L., Results of fibrogastroscopic and gastrobioptic examinations after acute acid burn, Z Gesamte Inn Med. 31 (1976), no. 11, 386-389.

. N. M. Di Costanzo J, Jouglard J, Escoffier JM, Cano N, Martin J, Gauthier A, New therapeutic approach to corrosive burns of the upper gastrointestinal tract, Gut 21 (1980), 370-375.

. e. a. Hao Tsai Cheng, Caustic ingestion in adults: The role of endoscopic classification in predicting outcom, BMC Gastroentrology 8 (2008), 31.

. A. S. George T., Peter A.L.B., Caustic esophageal injury in adults, uptodate 16.1 (2008).

. 14.C. Dafoe, Ross, CA., Acute corrosive oesophagitis, Thorax 24 (1969), 291.17. L. C. G. P. Rigo, et al, What is the utility of selected clinical and endoscopic parameters in predicting the risk of death after caustic ingestion?, Endoscopy 34 (2002), 304-310.

. 15. H. R. Poelman JR, Hoitsma HF., Endoscopy in lye burns of oesophagus and stomach, Endoscopy 9 (1977 ), no. 3, 172-177.

. 16.M. Han-Mo Chiu, Jaw-Town Lin, MD, et al, Prediction of bleeding and stricture formation after corrosive ingestion by eus concurrent with upper endoscopy, GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 60 (2004), no. 5, 827-829.

. M. M. Ferguson MK, et al, Early evaluation and therapy for caustic esophageal injury., Am J surg 157 (1989), no. 1, 116-120.

. R. J. M. NUNES Amadeu C. R., et al, Risk factors for stricture development after caustic ingestion., Hepato-gastroenterology 49 (2002), no. 48, 1563-1566.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-27