ADDRESSED AND ASSEMBLED PHONOLOGY OF BIDIRECTIONAL SOUND-TO –PRINT CONVERSIONS IN STUDENTS WITH DYSLEXIA AND A REFERENCE OF INVESTIGATION RESULTS TO CORRESPONDING FUNCTIONAL LOCALIZATION IN BRAIN CORTEX

Authors

  • Plamen petkov Associate-Professor, Ph. D. in “Konstantin Preslavsky” University of Shumen, Bulgaria, address: 9700 Shumen, 115 Universitetska St. @2Speech and
  • Eodoralvanova Speech and language therapists, Master Degree,
  • Nelly Vassileva Associate-Professor, Dr. Habil.InSofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria, address: 1504 Sofia, 15 TsarOsvoboditel Blvd
  • Zhivko Zheko Associate-Professor, Ph. D. in Medical University of Varna “Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov” Bulgaria, address: 9002Varna, 55 Prof. Marin Drinov St

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v4i3.43

Keywords:

dyslexia, sound-to-print conversions, phonological representation, orthography, pseudo words, addressed mechanisms, assembled mechanism

Abstract

Thirty   students   with   dyslexia   and   30   age-matched   normally   developed controls participated in a study to compare group performance and to examine their ability to convert auditory and visual verbal stimuli in two-way directions. Three  experiments and  13  tasks were  administered  to  the  students  and  3  types  of activities  were  explored.  The  first  one was focused on the student’s skills to match a heard word to a printed word, the second one was oriented  to  their  skills  to  match  a  heard  pseudo word  to  a  printed  pseudo word  and  the third one  was  an  examination  of  their  ability  to  readun familiar letter’s  strings. The elaborated results showed that there are statistically significant differences between the focus group and the controls regarding to the explored operations.  In fact the examined dyslexic children cannotmake conversions of phonological input into orthographic representation properly. It refers  as  to  meaningful  stimuli  (addressed  phonology),  as  to  pseudo words  (assembled phonology) as well. They have also difficulties in print-to-sound conversions when they read pseudo words.  A  reference  to other  studies ,focused  on brain  cortex  activation  and  reading shows  that  the  deficient  pseud word  reading  depends  on  the  dysfunctions  of left  posterior superior  temporal  gyrus  and  when  the  reading  difficulties  refer  to  meaningful  stimuli  and whole-word  phonological  conversions  (addressed  mechanism),  it  is  connected  to  deficient operations   in   left   posterior   middle   temporal   gyrus.   The   described   difficulties   and particularities  of  students  with  dyslexia, analysed  and  explained  through  the  addressed  and assembled   mechanism   deficits ,can   be   an   important   base   for   appropriate   treatment approaches and a directional point to the arrangement of speech and language therapy and oriented to the etiology educational interventions.

References

.Blachman,B.A.(2000). Phonologicalawareness.InM.L.Kamil,P.B.Mosenthal,P. D.Pearson,&R. Barr

(Eds.)Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 483-502). Mahwah, NH: Elbraum

.Breier, J. I., Simos, P.G., Zouridakis, G.,& Papanicolaou, A., C. (1998).Relative timing of cortical activationduringa word recognition task. Journal of Clinical and ExperimentalNeuropsychology20:782–790

.Breier, J. I., Simos, P.G., Zouridakis, G.& ,Papanicolaou, A., C. (1999a).Temporal course ofregionalactivation associated with phonological decoding.. Journal of Clinical andExperimentalNeuropsychology21: 465–476

.Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Arkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: dual-route andparallel-distributed-processing approaches. PsychologicalReview100:589–608.

.Damasio, H.,& Damasio, A. (1989). Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. New York. Oxford UniversityPress.

.Fiez , J. A., Balota, D. A., Raishle, M. E., & Peterson, S. E. (1999). Effects of lexicality, frequency, andspelling-to-sound consistency on the functional anatomy of reading. Neuron 24:205–218

.Fletcher, J. M., Shaywitz, S. E. , Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L. , Liberman, , I. Y., Stuebing, K. K., Francis, D.J.,Fowler, A. E., & ., Shaywitz B.A. (1994). Cognitive profile of reading disability: Comparison ofdiscrepancyand low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6-23

.Hagoort, P., Inderfrey, P., Brown, C., Herzog, H., Steinmetz, H., & Seitz, R. J. (1999).The neuralcircuitryinvolved in the reading of German words and pseudo words: a PET study. JournalofCognitiveNeuroscience11:383

-398

.Hart, J., Kraut, M. N., Kremen, S., Soher, B., Gordon, B.(2000).Neural substrates of orthograpphriac g lmeaxtiicc,a l s aecmcaesntsic,asdemonstrated by functional brain imaging. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychology Behavior Neurology 131–7

.Herbster, A. N., Mintum, M.E., Nebes, R. D., & Becker, J. T.(1997).Regional cerebral blood flow duringwordand nonwordreading. Human Brain Mapping5:84-92

.Kuperberg, G. R.,McGuire, P.K., Bulmore, E. T., Bramer, M. J., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Wright, I. C., Lythgoe,

D.J.,Williams, S.C., & David, A., C. (2000). Common and district neural substrates for

andsyntactic processing of spoken sentences: an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 321–341

.Lyon, G. H.(1995). Toward a definition of dyslexic. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 3–27

.Martin , A., Wiggs, C. L., & Weisberg, J. (1997). Modulation of human medial temporal lobe activity byform,meaning, and experience. Hippocampus 7: 587–593.

.Mavlov,L.(1997).Protsesatnaverbalnakomunikatsia–edinyerarhichenmodel[Theprocessofverbalcommunication-a hierarchic model. Special pedagogyvol. 3: 28–42] (in Bulgarian)

.Mummery,C. J., Patterson, K., Hodges, J.R., & Price, C. J. (1998).Functional neuroanatomy of thesemanticsystem: divisible by what?Journal ofCognitiveNeuroscience10:766-777

.Panagiotis, S.G., Breier, J. I., Fletcher, J., M., Foorman, B., R., Castillo, E. M., & Papanicolaou, A., C.(2002).Brainmechanismforreadingwordsandpseudowords:anintegratedapproach.CerebralCortex,12,297–305,OxfordUniversity Press.

.Price, C. J., Wise, R. J., & Frackowlak, R. C.(1996). Demonstrating the implicit processing of visuallypresentedwords and pseudo words. CerebralCortex6:62–70

.Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B.A., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweller, D. P., Katz, L., Fletcher, J. M., Skudlarski,P.,Fulbright, P. K., Constable, R. T., Bronen, R. A., Lacadie, C., & Core, J. C. (1997).Predicting readingperformancefrom neuroimaging profiles: the cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed wordidentification. Journal ofExperimentalPsychology23:299-318.

.Rumsey, J. M., Horwitz, B., Donohue, B. C., Nace, K., Maisog, J. M. & Andreason, P.(1997).Phonologicalandorthographiccomponentsofwordreading:aPET–rCBFstudy.Brain120:739-759.

.Seidenberg,M.S.,&McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition andnaming. PsychologicalReview96:523–568

.Shaywitz, B. A.,Fletcher, J.M. & Shaywitz, S. E.(1995). Defining and classifying learning disabilityandattention–deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Neurology, 10, S50-S57

.Simos, P.G, Papanicolaou, A., C., Breier, J. I.,Wilmore, L. J., Wheless, J. W., Constantinou, J. C.,Gormley,W., & Maggio, W. W. (1999).Localization oflanguage specific cortex using MEGand intraoperativestimulationmapping. Journal ofNeurosurgery 91:787–796

Downloads

Published

2017-12-27