IMPORTANCE OF CONSIDERING QUALITY INDICATORS IN PRIMARY HEALTHCARE. APPLICATION OF A TWOSTAGE CLUSTER ANALYSIS.

Dr. Ana Luisa Godoy Caballero; Dr. Luis Regino Murillo Zamorano

doi:10.53555/eijmhs.v4i2.33

Authors

Luisa Godoy Caballero Department of Economics. Faculty of Business, Finance and Tourism. University of Extremadura, 10071, Cáceres, Spain. Ext.: 51423.
Dr. Luis Regino Murillo Zamorano Department of Economics. Faculty of Business. University of Extremadura, 06006, Badajoz, Spain.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v4i2.33

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency and quality of primary healthcare in Extremadura (Spain), assessing at the same time the importance and influence of the quality indicators in the performance of the health units. This analysis considers a series of quality indicators that may affect the efficiency and activity levels of a series of primary care centres. We build different synthetic indices of quantitative output; output adjusted by quality; input, and costs, applying Principal Component Analysis. Using those indices we run several two‐stage cluster analyses. In a first analysis, the output of the health system is obtained from a strictly quantitative point of view and compared to the levels of inputs and costs. In a second analysis, we include an output adjusted by quality to perform such a comparison. The health units in which the region is organised can be clustered in four levels of efficiency and activity: efficientactive, efficient‐inactive, inefficient‐active and inefficient-inactive. The comparison of both analyses highlights the importance of considering qualitative indicators as they substantially influence the efficiency and activity levels of the different primary healthcare centres.

References

. Amado D, Dyson R (2008) on comparing the performance primary care providers. European Journal of Operational Research 185 (3), 1469-1482.

. Amado D, Dyson R (2009) Exploring the use of DEA for formative evaluation in primary diabetes care: an application to compare English practices. Journal of Operational Research 60 (11), 1469-1482.

. Ball G, Hall D (1965) ISODATA, a novel method of data anlysis and pattern classification. Technical report NTIS AD 699616. Stanford Research Institute, Stanford, CA.

. Chilingerian J, Sherman H (1997) DEA and primary care physician’s report cards: Deriving preferred practice cones from managed care service concepts and operating strategies. Annual Operational Research 73, 36-66

. Cordero JM, Crespo E, Murillo-Zamorano, LR (2014) the effect of quality and sociodemographic variables on efficiency measures in primary health care. The European Journal of Health Economics 15 (3), 289-302.

. Goñi S (1999) an analysis of the effectiveness of the Spanish primary health care teams. Health Policy 48 (2), 107-117.

. Greenly GE, Hooley GJ, Rudd JM (2005) Market orientation in a multiple stakeholder orientation context: implications for marketing capabilities and assets. Journal of Business Research 58 (11), 1483-1494.

. Jain KJ (2010) Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognistion Letters 31 (8), 651-666.

. Jain AK, Dubes RC (1988) Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

. Jobson J (1992) Applied Multivariate Data Analysis. Volume II: Categorical and Multivariate

. Methods. New York. Editorial Springer-Verlag. I.S.B.N.: 0-387-97804-6.

. Klecka WR (1980) Discriminant analysis. Sage, 19.

. Lloyd S (1982) Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 28 (2), 129–137.

. López-Sánchez JA, Santos-Vijande ML (2015) how value creation and relationship quality coalignment affects a firms’s performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing Channels 22 (3), 214-230.

. MacQueen J (1967) some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics. Statistics and Probability. University of California Press, 281–297.

. Milligan GW, Cooper MC (1987) Methodology review: Clustering methods. Applied Psychoclogical Measurement 11 (4), 329-354.

. Murillo-Zamorano LR, Petraglia C (2011) Technical efficiency in Primary Health Care: Does quality matter? The European Journal of Health Economics 12 (2), 115-125.

. Murillo-Zamorano LR, Vega J, Corrales N, Fernández Y, de Miguel FJ, Morillo J, Nogales L, Sánchez M (2011) APEX08. Sistema de Información de la Atención Primaria en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura, 2008. Consejería de Sanidad y Consumo, Junta de Extremadura. Murillo and Vega eds. ISBN: 978-84-6147-541-4.

. Puig-Junoy J, Ortún V (2004) Cost efficiency in primary care contracting: A stochastic frontier cost function approach. Health Economics 13 (12), 1149-1165.

. Punj G, Stewart DW (1983) Cluster analysis in marketing research: Review and suggestions for application. Journal of Marketing Research 134-148.

. Salinas-Jiménez J, Smith, PC (1996) Data Envelopment Analysis applied to quality in primary health care. Annals of Operational Research 67 (1), 141-161.

. Stock RM, Zacharias NA (2011) Patterns and performance outcomes of innovation orientation. Journal of Academic Marketing Science 39 (6), 870-888.

. Ward JHJr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 (301) pp. 236-244.

. Yang F, Sun T, Zhang C (2009) an efficient hybrid data clustering method based on K-harmonic means and particle swarm optimization. Experts Systems with Applications 36 (6), 9847-9852.