RÉSULTATS À MOYEN TERME DES PROTHÈSES UNICOMPARTIMENTALES DU GENOU À MADAGASCAR MEDIUM-TERM RESULTS OF UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN MADAGASCAR

Authors

  • Joe Clario Rabemanahaka Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique ET Traumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona (CHU-JRA) Antananarivo-Madagascar
  • Jean Baptiste Ramampisendrahova Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique ET Traumatologie, CHU Anosiala, Antananarivo Madagascar
  • Hanitrankasitrahana Amboara Sarobidy Rohimpitiavana Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique ET Traumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona (CHU-JRA) Antananarivo-Madagascar
  • Ny Aina Miharisoa Ralaivao Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique ET Traumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona (CHU-JRA) Antananarivo-Madagascar
  • Alexandrio Zo Lalaina Andrianina Rabemazava Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique ET Traumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona (CHU-JRA) Antananarivo-Madagascar
  • Henri Jean Claude Razafimahandry Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique ET Traumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona (CHU-JRA) Antananarivo-Madagascar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v6i4.145

Keywords:

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, result, Madagascar

Abstract

Introduction: the unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a globally recognized procedure for the treatment of osteoarthritis of a tibiofemoral compartment. It was carried out in Madagascar since 2012 at the Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona University Hospital Center (CHU-JRA) and this study is the first study concerning the UKA carried out in the country. The objective of this study is to assess the medium-term results of PUCs in Madagascar.

Methods: this was a six-year prospective study from 2012 to 2017 carried out in the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology of the CHU-JRA Antananarivo including all patients who received a UKA.

Results: twelve UKA were placed in eight patients. The mean age of the patients was 73.5 years. Mechanical pain in the internal compartment of the knee was the complaint of all patients, and the diagnosis of internal tibial osteoarthritis was confirmed after the x-ray. An improvement in the IKS (International Knee Society) score was found, with the average overall score which had gone from 132.5 preoperatively to 190 at the last follow-up, an IKS knee average score increased from 65 to 95 and an IKS score function increased from 67.5 to 95. After a mean follow-up of four years, the quality of life of the patients was excellent with the KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) which went from 26/100 before the operation to 98/100. Apart from a loosened prosthesis no other complication were found.

Conclusion: UKA is an ideal treatment for isolated osteoarthritis of a tibiofemoral compartment. It offers better physiological function, a less invasive surgical approach, a faster recovery time. This first study in Madagascar concerning the PUC found excellent mediumterm results but long-term patient follow-up will be necessary.

References

. Carlos Rodríguez E,Merchán Primitivo Gómez, Cardero. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: current indications, technical issues and results. EFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3:363-73.

. Debashish Mishra , Saurav N. Nanda , Saswat Samant , Sumanyu K. Tripathy , Ashok Gachhayat et Govind V J. Short-Term Functional Outcome and Satisfaction Rate of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Indian Population: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. 2020; 12(7): e9033.

. Michele Vasso, Alexander Antoniadis,Naeder Helmy. Update on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications and failure modes. EFORT Open Rev.2018; 3:442-48.

. Hummer J. Cotation des résultats fonctionnels des prothèses totales du genou. Orthop Traumatol. 1993 ; 3 : 83-7.

. Ingemar F Petersson, Torsten Boegård, Tore Saxne, Alan J Silman et Björn Svensson. Radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee classified by the Ahlbäck and Kellgren & Lawrence systems for the tibiofemoral joint in people aged 35–54 years with chronic knee pain. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 1997;56:493-96.

. Ewa M Roos et Stefan Lohmander. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2003;1:64.

. Lucie Belkaious , Philippe Neyret , Sébastien Lustig , Elvire Servien. Les prothèses unicompartimentales du genou : le pour et le contre. Revue du rhumatisme monographies. 2016 ; 8 : 3172–179.

. Nader Naouar, Hamdi Kaziz, Thabet Mouelhi,Karim Bouattour,Mohamed Mseddi et Mohamed Laziz Ben Ayeche. Evaluation à long terme de l’arthroplastie unicompartimentale interne de genou chez les sujets jeunes. La tunisie Medicale. 2016;94(1): 66-71.

. Ryland Kagan,Mike B. Anderson,Travis Bailey, Aaron A. Hofmann et Christopher E. Pelt. Ten-Year Survivorship, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Satisfaction of a Fixed Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today.2020; 6: 267-73.

. Jong Hun Ji, Sang Eun Park, In Soo Song, Hanvit Kang, Ji Yoon Ha, Jae Jung Jeong. Complications of Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2014;6:365-372.

. Stefano Campia, Saket Tibrewalb, Rory Cuthbertb, Sheo B. Tibrewal. Unicompartmental knee replacement – Current perspectives. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2018;9: 17-23.

. Felts E, Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM et Argenson JN. Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2010; 96:861-67.

. Georg Hauer, Patrick Sadoghi, Gerwin A. Bernhardt, Matthias Wolf, Paul Ruckenstuh, Andrea Fink, Andreas Leithner et Gerald Gruber. Greater activity, better range of motion and higher quality of life following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparative case–control study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.2020;140:231-23.

. Kyung Tae Kim,Song Lee, Jeehyoung Kim, Jin Woo Kim et Min Su Kang. Clinical Results of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery. 2016; 8:386-92.

. Hannah A Wilson, Rob Middleton, Simon G F Abram, Stephanie Smith, Abtin Alvand, William F Jackson, Nicholas Bottomley, Sally Hopewell et Andrew J Price. Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019; 364: l352.

. Alexander D Liddle, Andrew Judge, Hemant Pandit et David W Murray. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101 330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet.2014; 384: 1437-45.

. Emerson RH, Alnachoukati O, Barrington J et Ennin K. The results of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98 (10):34-40.

. Georg Hauer, Gerwin A. Bernhardt, Gloria Hohenberger, Lukas Leitner, Paul Ruckenstuhl, Andreas Leithner, Gerald Gruber et Patrick Sadogh. Similar revision rates in clinical studies and arthroplasty registers and no bias for developer publications in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020; 140:537-544.

. Lisowski LA, L. I. Meijer LI, Van Den Bekerom MPJ, Pilot P et Lisowski AE. Ten- to 15-year results of the Oxford Phase III mobile unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J.2016;98 (10):41-7.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-27