SECOND AUDIT OF THE IMPROVED REHABILITATION AFTER CAESAREAN SECTION AT THE MOTHER-CHILD COMPLEX AT THE MILITARY HOSPITAL OF ANTSIRANANA.

Authors

  • RAELISON JG RABARIKOTO HF Complexe mère-enfant, Hôpital Militaire, Antsiranana
  • RAHANITRINIAINA NMP Réanimation chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona, Antananarivo
  • VELOMORA A Anesthésie Réanimation, Hopital Manara-penitra, Antsiranana
  • RAVOAVY SA Réanimation médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona, Antananarivo
  • AMAROLAHY RA Réanimation médicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona, Antananarivo
  • RAJAONERA AT Réanimation chirurgicale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Joseph Ravoahangy Andrianavalona, Antananarivo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v5i4.127

Keywords:

Caesarean section, evaluation, improved rehabilitation

Abstract

Introduction: The first audit shows the difficulty of implementing early feeding, oral analgesia, removal of the urinary catheter as well as stopping the infusion, with a median duration of 3.5 days. Our objectives are to evaluate adherence to the protocol after the audit and to determine the impact on the stay hard.

METHOD: This is a prospective observational audit study, from February to July 15, 2019, at the Mother-Child Complex of the Antsiranana Military Hospital. Parturients operated for caesarean section under spinal anesthesia, ASA 1 or 2 are included in this study.

Results: Seventy-four patients were retained. Intraoperatively, optimization of vascular filling was performed in 60 patients (81%). All patients received prevention of postoperative nausea / vomiting and intrathecal morphine. In the post-intervention ward, oral analgesia is started within one hour after surgery in all patients (100%). The peripheral venous route is obstructed in 71 cases (96%). The urinary catheter was removed from 71 patients (96%). Seventy-two cases (97%) resumed drinking in unlimited quantities and a light diet at the fourth hour. Two cases (3%) had postoperative nausea and urinary retention requiring an evacuating catheter. The median length of stay of the mother / newborn couple in hospital was 3 (2-3) days. Conclusion: there is an increase in the adhesion of the protocol. It decreases the length of stay of hospitalization.

References

.Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CHC, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery

after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr.

;24(3):466‑77.

.Wyniecki A, Raucoules-Aimé M, de Montblanc J, Benhamou D. Réhabilitation précoce après césarienne

programmée : enquête de pratique auprès des maternités des régions Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur et Île-de-France. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim; 2013,32(3),149-56.

.Deniau B, Bouhadjari N, Faitot V, Mortazavi A, Kayem G et al. Evaluation of a continuous improvement

programme of enhanced recovery after caesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia. Anaesth Crit Care PainMed; 2016 ;35(6):395-99.

.Sultan P, Halpern SH,Pushpanathan E, Patel S, Carvalho B. The effect of intrathecal morphine dose on outcomes

after elective cesarean delivery: A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2016; 123:154–64.

.Rousseau A, Sadoun M, Aimé I, Leguen M, Carbonnel M, et al. Étude comparative sur la réhabilitation améliorée

postcésarienne : quels bénéfices, quels risques ? Gynécol Obstét Fertil Sénol. 2017:45(7‑8):387-92.

.Tan PC, Norazilah MJ, Omar SZ. Hospital Discharge on the First Compared With the Second Day After a Planned

Cesarean Delivery.Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:1273–82.

.Davis KM, Esposito MA, Meyer BA. Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient controlled analgesia for

pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 967-71.

.Cattin A, De Baene A, Achon E, Bersot Y, Destoop Q, et al. Évaluation de la mise en place d’un protocole de

réhabilitation précoce postcésarienne. Gynécol Obstét Fertil Sénol. 2017,45(4),202-9.

.Abell D, Pool AW, Sharafudeen S,and SkeltonV.Dasan J, Fleming I. Enhancedrecovery in obstetric surgery

(Kings-EROS): early results from one of the UKs first programmes: 11AP5-10. Europ J Anaesthesiol. 2014:192.

.Orji EO, Olabode TO, Kuti O, Ogunniyi SO. A randomized controlled trial of early initiation of oral feeding after

cesarean section. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(1):65–71.

.Lyon A, Solomon MJ, Harrison JD. A Qualitative Study assessing the barriers to implementation of Enhanced

Recovery After Surgery. World J Surg. 2014;38(6):1374‑80.

.Halder S, Onwere C, BrennanC, Singh N, Cox M, Yentis S. PA.07 Enhanced recovery programme for elective

caesarean section. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014; 99:A19.

.Wrench IJ, Allison A, Galimberti A, Radley S, Wilson MJ, et al. Introduction of enhanced recovery for elective

caesarean section enabling next day discharge: a tertiary centre experience. Int J Obstet Anesth; 2015,24(2),124-130.

.Vickers R, Das B, Machineni V. Enhanced recovery in obstetrics. Int J Obstet Anesth 2013; 22:S13.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-27