CLINICAL NORMS FOR AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE TESTING FOR FEMALES AT THE KORLEBU TEACHING HOSPITAL, ACCRA, GHANA

Authors

  • Sesi Collins Akotey University of Education, Winneba, Ghana
  • Geoffrey K. Amedofu Korlebu Teaching Hospital, Korlebu, Accra
  • Samuel Anim-Sampong University of Ghana, School of Biomedical Sciences and Allied Health, Legon.
  • Samuel K. Hayford University of Education, Winneba, Ghana
  • Yaw Nyadu Offei University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v2i4.122

Keywords:

Auditory brainstem response, waves, intensity, normative, latency

Abstract

The aim of the study was to create an in-house normative data for neurodiagnostic auditory brainstem response test for the Korlebu Teaching Hospital Hearing Assessment Center, to enable the Centre to provide a comparative standard for making informed diagnostic decisions about patients’ auditory function using the Intelligent Hearing System (IHSSEP). A purposive sample of 25 females aged between 18-35 years with normal hearing thresholds were selected for the study. Data was analyzed using one sample independent t-test, mean, and standard deviation with the statistical significance set to p<0.05 to determine how the clinical norms compared with the manufacturer’s norm. Results showed that the absolute latencies generated by the study varied slightly from the IHSSEP norms. However, the variations emanated from the testing environment, the protocol used, and the software specifications of the testing equipment rather than pathological conditions from the participants. Besides, the norm data fulfilled the requirement of the upper and lower limits allowable for norm data to be considered as appropriate - thus a ±2 SD. It was concluded that the norms values were appropriate to use in testing and estimating hearing sensitivity at Korlebu Teaching Hospital Hearing Assessment Centre taking into account the clinical conditions and the varying parameters of the testing equipment.

References

. Arnold, S. A. (2000). The auditory brainstem response. In J. Roeser, M. Valente & H.Hosford Dunn (Eds.) Auditory diagnosis. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc; 2000. p. 451-470.

. Atcherson, S. R. (2012). The auditory brainstem response. In S. R. Atcherson and T.M.Stooday (Eds). Auditory Electrophysiology: A Clinical Guide. New York: Thieme Medical publishers Inc. 2012.

. http://books.google.com.gh/books?id=8JsB5XQV3AcC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage &q&f=false ccessed June 18, 2015.

. Baiduc, R. R., Poling, G. L., Hong, O., and Dhar, F. S. (2013). Clinical measures of auditory function: The cochlear and beyond. Disease-a-Month 59. 147–156

. Burkard, R. F., and Secor, C. (2000). Overview of auditory evoked potentials. In J. Katz (Ed.).

. Handbook of Clinical Audiology (5th ed). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

. Coenraad, S., Van Immerzeel, T., Hoeve, L. J., and Goedegebure, A. (2010). Fitting model of ABR age dependency in a clinical population of normal hearing children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 267:1531–1537

. Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). New York: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data...

. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.

. Don, M., and Kwong, B. (2009). Auditory brainstem response: differential diagnosis. In J. Katz, L. Medwetsky, R. Burkard, L. Hood (Eds.). Handbook of Clinical Audiology (6th Ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

. Gathe, B. M., Gandhe, M. B., Gandhe, S. W., Puttewar, A. N., Saraf, C., and Singh, R. (2015) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) – A pilot study conducted on young healthy adults from Central India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. 2014.8(6):BC16BC18. http://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/4515/8720_180414_R2_8720_CE%5BRa1%5D_PF1% 28AGAK%29_PFA%28AK%29.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan, 2015.

. Gelfand, S. A. (2009) Essentials of audiology (3rd ed). New York: Thieme Medical Publishers Inc.

. Hall, J. W. (1992). Handbook of auditory evoked responses. Massachusetts: Library of congress cataloguing-in-publishing data.

. Hall, J. W. (2007). New handbook for auditory evoked response. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.

. Hall, J. W., and Mueller, H. G. (1997). Audiologist desk reference. Vol.1: Diagnostic audiology principles, procedures, and protocols. London: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.

. Hood, L. J. (1998). Clinical applications of the auditory brainstem response. London: Singular Publishing group, Inc.

. McMillan, J. H. (1997). Schumacher S. Research in education: A conceptual introduction. New York: Longman.

. Ness, D. A. (2009). Normative data for neurodiagnostic auditory brainstem response testing (ABR). Ann Arbor: ProQuest LLC.http://books.google.com.gh/books?hl=en&lr=&id=UzxZwLgxXrgC&oi=fnd&pg=PR3& dq=Ness,+D.+A.+%282009%29.+Normative+data+for+neurodiagnostic+auditory+brainstem+response+testing++%28ABR %29. Accessed 24 Dec 2012

. Offei, Y. N. (2013). Educational audiology in Ghana – developing screening tools for hearing in infants and children. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Koln; 2013.

. Silman, S., and Silverman, C. A. (1991). Auditory diagnosis; principles and applications. Brooklyn: Academic Press Inc; 1991.

. Sininger, Y. S., and Hyde, M. L. (2009). Auditory brainstem response in audiometric threshold prediction. In Katz J, Medwetsky L, Burkard R, Hood L. (Eds.).Handbook of Clinical Audiology (6th Ed.). Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.

. Sokolov, Y., Kurtz, I., Steinman, A., Long, G., and Sokolova, O. (2005). Integrity Technology: Making ABR practical. Toronto: Vivosonic Inc. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from http://www.audioelectronicsinc.com/images/Integrity_Technology_-_r_9__05_08_29.pdf

. Vanderstoep, S. W., and Johnston, D. D. (2009). Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-27