Role of immunohistochemistry in differentiating primary hepatocellular carcinoma using manual tissue microarray technique and its advantage
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v11i1.265Keywords:
Hepatocellular carcinoma, diagnosis, histopathologicalAbstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of liver cancer worldwide, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly in distinguishing it from metastatic liver tumors. This study evaluates the role of tissue microarray (TMA) technology and immunohistochemical markers, specifically Hep Par-1 and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), in the differentiation and characterization of HCC.Thirty cases of HCC were analyzed, including 11 well-differentiated, 3 moderately differentiated, and 16 poorly differentiated tumors. TMA construction was performed, and immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess Hep Par-1 and AFP expression. Hep Par-1 demonstrated granular cytoplasmic positivity, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 100%. Reactivity decreased with poorer differentiation, as all six negative cases were poorly differentiated. AFP positivity was observed in 45% of cases, with no significant correlation to differentiation level.Age distribution revealed a peak incidence between 31 and 70 years, with a male predominance (60%). Comparative analyses with previous studies confirmed consistent epidemiological trends and highlighted the diagnostic challenges in poorly differentiated HCC.The findings reaffirm Hep Par-1 as a reliable marker for HCC diagnosis, particularly in well-differentiated cases. AFP was less reliable due to variability in expression. The use of TMAs enhanced efficiency and reduced costs, supporting their utility in histopathological research. These results underscore the importance of combining morphological, immunohistochemical, and clinical data for accurate HCC diagnosis and management.
References
Lamps,L.W. and Folpe, A.L. The diagnostic value of hepatocyte paraffin antibody 1 in differentiating hepatocellular neoplasms from nonhepatic tumours: a review. Adv Anat Pathol 2003;10;39-43.
Hep Par-1: A Novel Immunohistochemical Marker for Differentiating Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Metastatic Carcinoma- Razia Hanif and Samina Mansoor, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre.
Tickoo, S.K.,S.Y. Zee, et al. (2002). Combined hepatocellular- cholangiocarcinoma: a histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridisation study. “Am J Surg Pathol 26(8):989-97.
Tissue Microarray: A rapidly evolving diagnostic and research tool, Nazar M. T. Jawhar.
Shergill IS, Shergill NK, Arya M, Patel HR. Tissue microarrays: a current medical research tool. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 May;20(5):707–12.
Hurlimann J, Gardiol D. Immunohistochemistry in the differential diagnosis of liver carcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15(3): 2800-288.
Mivervini MI, Demetris AJ, Lee RG, Carr BI, Madariaga J, Nalesnik MA. Utilization of hepatocyte-specific antibody in the immunocytochemical evaluation of liver tumsors. Mod Pathol 1997; 10(7): 686-692.
Thung SN, Gerber MA, Sarno E, Popper H. Distribution of 5 antigens in hepatocellular carcinoma. Lab Invest 1979; 41(2): 101-105.
Chu PG, Ishizawa S, Wu E, Weiss LM. Hepatocyte antigen as a marker of hepatocellular carcinoma. An immunohistochemical comparison to carcinoembryonic antigen, CD10, and alpha-fetoprotein. Am J Surg Pathol 2002; 26(8): 978-988.
Lau SK, Prakash S, Geller SA, Alsabeh R. Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 2002; 33(12): 1175-1181.