THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY OF CODMANS VERSUS MAITLAND REGIME FOR THE TREATMENT OF FROZEN SHOULDER SYNDROME

Authors

  • Preeti Sing Physiotherapy Unit, Six face physiotherapy clinics, New Delhi, India
  • Karthikeyan Physiotherapy Unit, NIMHANS University, Bengaluru, India
  • Moorthy Physiotherapy Unit, JPN Apex Trauma Centre AIIMS University, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v4i2.34

Keywords:

Frozen shoulder syndrome, Codman shoulder exercise, Visual analog scale

Abstract

Frozen shoulder syndrome is a commonly encountered clinical complaint. It is encountered by clinicians (General Practitioners (GP’s), Rheumatologists, Orthopedic surgeons) and physical therapists (Physiotherapy, Osteopathy, Chiropractic).Shoulder joint is one of the most rewarding and functional joints involved in daily routines including performances, occupational and recreational activities.

Aim to Compare the Therapeutic efficacy of codmans and Maitland regime for the treatment of frozen shoulder syndrome

Methods Each group consists of fifteen patients and they were equally divided into two groups such as Group A and B. The group include both male and female with the age group of 30-55 years. One group of patients treated with conventional Shoulder exercise regime and other group treated with Maitland manipulation.

Study Design Comparative study with pretest and post –test design

Results Group A patients which shows significantly 1.46(P0.05) pain reduction. Group B patients which shows significantly 1.40(P0.05).Finally both the groups shows the pain reduction

Clinical Implications The notion of the current study which provides evidence that Conventional Shoulder exercises and Maitland mobilization were equally effective for the management of pain in frozen shoulder.

Both manual mobilization therapy along with general exercises and exercises alone brought improvements in outcome measure scales for pain, glenohumeral ranges and shoulder pain.

References

.Robert A.Donatelli (2004),Physical therapy of the Shoulder-Fourth edition .Churchill Living stone

.Rizk TE, Pinals RS (1982): Frozen Shoulder, Semin Arthritis Rheum 2:440.

.Codman EA (1934: The Shoulder, Boston,,Thomas Todd Co.

.Nevasier JS (1962): Arthrography of the shoulderjoint, J Bone Joint Surgery (Br44):1321-1330, 1962.

.Manish Samnani et al (2006):Effectiveness of using passive exercises coupled with therapeutic activities to improve functional hand-to-back in Frozen Shoulder.

.Frances Cuomo (1999):Disorders of the shoulder: Diagnosis and management, edited by Joseph P. Iannotti and Gerald R. Williams Jr. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

.Binder A, Bulgen DY, Hazleman BL (1984).Frozen shoulder: a long term prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis;43:361.

.Bulgen DY, Hazleman BL, Ward M, et al (1978),Immunological studies in frozen shoulder. Ann Rheum Dis; 37:135.

.Thomas D, Williams RA, Smith DS (2003).The frozen shoulder: a review of manipulative treatment. Rheumatol Rehabil;19:173

.Parker RD, Froimson AI, Winsburg DD, et al (2014).Frozen shoulder chronology, pathogenesis, clinical picture and treatment. Orthopedics; 12:869.

.LundbergBJ (2005).The frozen shoulder: clinical and Radiographical observations. The effect of manipulation under anesthesia: structure andglycosaminoglycan content of the joint capsul.Acta ortho scand; 119:1-59.

.Baslund B, Thomsen BS, Jensen EM (2010).Frozen shoulder: current concepts. Scand J Rheum; 19:321.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-27